The New Star Wars Movies – Why Disney is Screwing it Up


Hey 3.5 readers.

Oddly, “Solo” did poorly at the box office, even though I think it was pretty good.  Out of the four new films, “Rogue One” and “Solo” are the only ones I’m interested in watching again.  “Force Awakens” and “Last Jedi” are drek.

Which leads me to a conclusion – “Star Wars” only works during the period of the Empire’s reign and ensuing war against the Rebellion.  You’ve got the best villain in movie history, Darth Vader, who, let’s be honest, carries the franchise.  You’ve got the most beloved characters – Luke, Leia, Han, Chewie et all.

The prequels were fun at the time they were released but they don’t hold up over time (though “Revenge of the Sith” is solid.)  Sith holds up because we see Yoda being a badass, we see Anakin’s final transformation into Vader.  Vader always makes these movies watchable.

Alas, when we lose Vader and the original characters and/or time period, the franchise starts to poop the bed.  Keep in mind “Rogue One” had all new characters and a brief Vader cameo.  The new characters carry it because we understand the stakes – the Empire doesn’t mess around and to be caught means certain death for the rebels.

I think Disney sort of understood that the Empire vs. Rebellion dynamic sells the franchise.  So, they attempted to resurrect it with this odd idea that is never really explained, namely that the Republic has been restored but remnants of the Empire and Rebellion are still fighting each other in the form of the “First Order” and “The Resistance.”

Meh.  Lame.  One would think it would be the Republic vs. the First Order or what have you.  We learn little of Snoke, while Kylo Ren is sort of fun as an emo Vader wannabe quasi hipster rebel against mom and dad millennial Sith lord, there just isn’t enough story.  We’re thrown in and we aren’t told a lot about this world.

Further, there were attempts to capitalize on Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford and the late Carrie Fisher being around long enough to appear in the films.  In retrospect, perhaps they would have been better used in sequels in the late 1990s, early 2000s where they were younger and more spry.  They weren’t in fighting shape this go-around, not knocking them, that’s just what time does to us.

But look what they did to Han and Leia.  These great heroes are relegated to an elderly, washed up bickering couple.  Maybe Leia isn’t because she’s a general but Han apparently never gets behind traveling the galaxy with his furry BFF Chewie.  Didn’t we, as fans, want more for these beloved characters?

As fans, didn’t we envision Luke traveling the galaxy, getting into adventures in his middle and old age?  Did we really want him to just run off to an island, become a hermit and a whiner?

Let me break it down.  “Solo” proved (well, to me but apparently not to the public) that younger actors could play Solo, Lando and thus younger actors could have played Leia, Luke, etc.

They did it with “Star Trek.”  Sure, we balked.  But then we remembered that Chris Pine isn’t an insult to Shatner but an homage.  The new doesn’t replace the old.  It’s just a way we can bring our old faves back again.

All the original characters were fairly young at the end of “Return of the Jedi” so there was a whole, big, beautiful timeline that could have been explored between Luke, Leia and Han’s youth and their old age.  You could have incorporated Hammill, Ford and Fisher into it, maybe as old timers remembering their youth.

There’s a whole slew of novels that the fans loved that cover the time after the fall of the Empire, showing our heroes going up against remnants of the Empire and even facing new villains.

So, I think there was a big well of possibility there that was left untapped.  And sadly, to stay true to the new dumb films, if it is ever tapped, you have to make Han and Leia a bitter divorced couple who never see each other.

Are “Awakens” and “Last” fun spectacles?  Maybe “Awakens” was ok for the nostalgia factor, but “Last Jedi” left me disappointed.

The whole thing has taught me that other than Empire vs. Rebellion, there really isn’t any idea for a future for the franchise.  I understand that Hammill, Ford and Fisher are iconic and not easy to replace.  Those are big shoes to fill.  But we felt that way about “Star Trek” and low and behold, that worked and with careful cast selection and good writing, it could have worked again here.

They’ve chosen to mine the Empire days with side stories but I really think the main saga could have continued with young actors playing the originals.

Oh well.  At some point, the saga will have to enter a new time period with a whole new setting, a whole new power structure, new villains, new heroes, and, God help us, they’re going to have to come up with a new threat other than the Death Star.

Until a solid writing team nails that, they should stick with Empire vs. Rebellion and perhaps look into seeing if the Han/Leia divorce can be written off as a bad dream.  Perhaps Episodes 7-9 can all be written off as a bad fever dream had by Chewie when he got a hold of some tainted chili cheese fries and farted himself into a coma.

Then when he wakes up, he’s with a younger cast.  It picks up after “Return of the Jedi” and a young Luke, Han and Leia travel the galaxy tracking down the Empire remnants.








Tagged , , ,

2 thoughts on “The New Star Wars Movies – Why Disney is Screwing it Up

  1. Hey, BQB! I haven’t seen Solo, but I absolutely second your assessment of the series in general: that the saga’s most compelling drama grew out of the Rebellion-versus-Empire conflict as depicted in the original trilogy. There’s a practical reason Lucas started the narrative with A New Hope: because that was where things got interesting. Any relevant backstory that had occurred prior to Episode IV could be (and was) efficiently addressed through exposition; the prequels only dramatized what we already knew, in far more detail than we needed. And you’re right: the sequel trilogy’s attempt to replicate that conflict via the “First Order” (whatever that is) is ill-defined and confusing.

    Much of what was produced in the EU novels, set during the post-Return of the Jedi period, was more engaging — and certainly more logical — because it depicted the challenges in rebuilding both the Republic and the Jedi Order, and actually developed the characters of Luke, Han, and Leia, rather than reverting them to their pre-A New Hope characterizations (Han and Leia) or turning them into something utterly unrecognizable (Luke).

    I know fans were hoping for otherwise with these new movies, but I think it’s safe to say the magic is gone.

    • I think we need to realize that actors don’t own characters as much as we’d like for them to forever. I remember scoffing about someone other than Shatner playing Kirk but then Pine pulled it off and I didnt think the new Star Trek took away from the old.

      I’m not sure why Solo did so badly because I think it was good. Maybe I’m old so when I think is good isn’t good anymore. But young actors pulled off playing Han and Lando, so young actors could have pulled off Luke and Leia….if there hadn’t been two new movies that claim that Luke went to a monastery to stare at the wall for 40 years and Han and Leia divorced and never saw each other again until old age. Now that has to be worked around.

      My feeling watching Force Awakens was that it built up a lot and promised a lot…though I did think it was a retelling of New Hope but with a girl as Luke…it built up the next movie heavily. It looked like there was a big reveal about Rey’s parents, that she felt a connection to Luke’s lightsaber, perhaps she’s his daughter? Maybe he had to go fight some evil and his only choice was to leave her on a desert planet like he knew growing up?

      And doesn’t a young Jedi need a master to train her? Surely, Luke could teach her a lot and…oh, no sorry. No big answer on her parents and Luke is just a bitter old bastard. Don’t worry, Rey is just naturally trained even though past rules indicate all jedis need training.

      On top of that Last Jedi built some stuff within that film that fizzled. Millenials seem to be all about toppling the crappy world their parents built and starting a nice, new one that is fair to all. So…there was a brief moment when Kylo asks Rey to join him and…briefly I thought the writers would have her say yes and completely turn the franchise on its ear. Del Toro’s character, earlier in the film, said both Order and Resistance bought weapons from the same place, that they were two sides of the same coin. I know when I watch the news I wonder when the Dems and Reps will drop the dog and pony show and just solve some problems already. So I think Rey saying yes would have really flipped the script.

      I get sometimes writers want to do a fake out, make you think X is coming then give you Y, and sometimes that’s ok, but they did it so much that I dont expect any threads they create now to have anything behind them when they are pulled…unless that was their plan, to make me not believe only to reveal big stuff in film three.

      I just think that from end of Return of Jedi until the old age of the original heroes, there was a lot of fresh ground to mine and Disney might have considered that. We hate to see new actors in iconic roles but with good casting and writing it can work.

      Look at James Bond. We all have our favorite Bonds but I can’t really think of a poor Bond casting. All fit the bill. Whnever a Bond film missed, it was the writing and not the man playing Bond.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: