I failed to post a daily discussion today, or yesterday by the time people start seeing this post.
And my 3.5 readers did not even scold me!
You’re too kind, 3.5 readers. You’re too kind.
I failed to post a daily discussion today, or yesterday by the time people start seeing this post.
And my 3.5 readers did not even scold me!
You’re too kind, 3.5 readers. You’re too kind.
Oh Monday. How you sneak up on me and my 3.5 readers.
The latest debate in the nerdosphere is whether or not Apocalypse should have strangled Mystique.
Read more about it in Variety.
So if you’re not a nerd, there’s a new X-Men movie out, X-Men: Apocalypse.
The plot is that the meanest mutant of all time has been lying dormant for thousands of years, but is back and ready to conquer the world.
To promote the film, Fox put out posters featuring Apocalypse strangling Mystique (the blue bodied, orange haired shapeshifter that dudes dig because she sort of walks around naked all the time except she doesn’t have nipples or a butt crack so it’s like Marvel found a loophole to have a naked chick walk around in their movies.)
Rose McGowan, who used to be on Charmed but I can’t think of anything she’s done lately, took offense, complaining on the Interwebs that this promoted violence against women.
Eh…here’s my two cents.
Could the studio have chosen a different image to promote the movie?
Yes.
Did I notice a problem until Rose McGowan said something about it?
No.
And you could say that maybe that means I’m oblivious to the plight of violence against women but rather, I’d say you women folk have done a fine job of training me like a dog to recognize women as equals.
I saw these ads around and it didn’t pop into my mind “Oh geez. Violence against a woman.”
Nope. All I really thought was “Cool. New X-Men movie.” And if anything, I thought, “Wow. Looks like Mystique’s in a bit of a pickle with this new bad guy.”
In other words, I didn’t see the ad so much as portraying violence against a woman but rather, a superhero taking on a super villain, combined with the thought that this villain is the worst the X-Men have ever faced as even the powerful ninja shapeshifter Mystique is getting bested.
That’s what we want, right? We want Mystique to be considered just as big a bad ass as Cyclops or Wolverine, don’t we?
When I saw this ad I didn’t think “Damn it. A woman is getting abused.”
I thought, “Holy shit! Apocalypse is the scariest villain ever! If even the great and powerful Mystique can’t handle him then surely we are all fucked royally! Everyone run for your lives! Apocalypse is coming! Get me to this movie so I can see just how evil Apocalypse is and how fucked all the X-Men are, whether or not they have penises or vaginas, all X-Men are truly fucked when this monstrous villain comes along!”
I don’t mean to complain but in my opinion, there’s just never been a time like the present where men have no idea what to do to keep women happy.
Consider:
- It is sexist to show Mystique getting roughed up by a male villain.
- It would also be sexist to tell Mystique she needs to sit out the fight because she’s a fragile delicate woman who couldn’t possibly defeat a man.
So…what the heck do we do then?
Equality is great and all but I have to admit there have been some times when I fear that women, in their quest for equality, may have abandoned some things that actually made them better than men.
Case in point. Ronda Rousey. Most popular female UFC fighter ever. Trained in martial arts. Can beat up the strongest dudes with her pinky finger.
Good for her and all but sometimes I’ll see female UFC fighters knocking the crap out of each other and wonder if maybe, just maybe, “knocking the crap out of each other” might have been one of those male concepts that women would have been better off had they not aspired to.
Yes, you women have the right to beat each other up in a UFC fight, but why do you want to?
I’m a man and I don’t even want to fight anyone.
But I also understand that not every man and/or woman is the same. Not every man and/or woman wants to be a fighter.
It just becomes hard for me to know what to say. If women are clamoring for more female superheroes (“Rah rah, we can fight evil just like the men!”) then you can’t have it both ways.
You can’t demand more female superheroes, put those superheroes in a position where they have to fight evil, then cry foul or “Hey! You’re being mean to a woman!” if the big bad villain knocks the female superhero around.
Because honestly, it would be easy to start getting a little old school on this. I’d rather not see women get beaten up on screen, so if women don’t want that to happen, then we can just start a movement for women to no longer be superheroes. (I’m just trying to prove a point. I don’t want women to stop being superheroes.)
Then again, I also realize this is all fantasy. Men don’t have superpowers either. But these films are make believe. We’re expected to suspend disbelief and assume these men and women have superpowers. We shouldn’t look at the men or the women as being mere fragile humans but rather superheroes with great abilities.
It’s playing pretend. These films let us fantasize about how great life would be for us if we had special powers and since these movies are open to everyone, the fantasy is easier to indulge in when each movie goer sees someone who they can relate to. Men can fantasize about being male heroes. Women can fantasize about female superheroes and so on.
Eh. I can see all the points on this. Perhaps that didn’t need to be the image they put out everywhere.
Otherwise, I don’t know women. Yes, they are many douchey men out there who get off on violence against women.
On the other hand, the majority of average, trying to do the right thing men will probably do whatever you want, because let’s face it, that’s what we do anyway.
You want us to treat you as fragile and keep you out of the superhero fights? We will. (I say we like I’m some kind of studio exec that can make this happen.)
But if you want to be superheroes and fight evil villains alongside male superheroes then that’s great too.
Just keep in mind villains like Apocalypse don’t believe in chivalry. Apocalypse isn’t going to think, “Huh. Mystique’s a woman so maybe I ought to go easier on her.”
No. Apocalypse is going to think, “This is a do-gooder superhero who is trying to get between me and my plans for world domination so I better stop her.”
Look, I don’t want to get carried away, it’s just that at the end of the day, Mystique getting strangled by Apocalypse means she’s been accepted in the world of superheroes.
Wolverine, Cyclops, Gambit, Professor X, Nightcrawler – shit. Ask any of them and they’ll tell you that getting strangled by a villain is just a hazard of the job.
You could argue it would have been sexist for Mystique to not have been strangled by Apocalypse.
Apocalypse beats up all the male heroes and then pats Mystique on the head and says, “Take a break honey?”
Please. Had that happened I would have contacted a civil rights lawyer immediately to help me voice my anti-sexism concerns.
What say you, 3.5 readers?
Happy Sunday 3.5 Readers.
BQB here to talk about an article in The Atlantic – Stealing Books in the Age of Self-Publishing by Joy Lanzendorfer.
The article discusses how it is too easy for some unscrupulous people to take the works of others, change them around a little bit and then pass them off as their own, profiling authors who have had this happen to them.
Apparently it happens more often than people realize, and it isn’t always so blatant that is easily discovered. Sometimes plagiarized books are up for awhile and as the article notes, it is usually a plucky reader that spots the similarities and alerts the author.
To make this a BQB Daily Discussion, what are some ways that self-publishers can protect themselves from such chicanery?
Good morning 3.5 readers.
We’re waking up to news that “The Greatest” boxer, “Muhammad Ali” has passed away at 74.
Those who followed his career remember his poetic ability to taunt opponents with proud, public declarations of his abilities.
Obviously, the one to me, that is most memorable and I have heard used most often in pop culture is, “I float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.”
Can you think of any others? Or do you have any memories to share?
Happy Friday 3.5 Readers.
Robert Kirkman of Walking Dead fame recently said in an interview that he would not allow a network to take control of his show the way George RR Martin has.
My two cents:
a) GRRM is almost 70 years old. Though I’m sure he is enjoying all the attention his life’s work is getting, it did come at the end, not exactly at a time when he could enjoy all the accompanying fame and fortune. He needs to balance the need to get his last novels in the series done with not wearing himself out to the point where he keels over.
b) HBO has done a great job. Currently, we’re in the first season in which the show begins to diverge from Martin’s books (the show has progressed farther past the point where GRRM has written) and the consensus is that it has been the most riveting season yet. That’s to trash Martin. He has been advising HBO on what he intends to do next and they are carrying it out.
I don’t know. I don’t mean to knock Kirkman either as the Walking Dead is also pretty great.
I just think GRRM and Kirkman are in two different places. Kirkman is young enough he can still run the show whereas Martin needs extra naps.
What say you, 3.5 readers?
Happy Thursday 3.5 readers.
There’s been a twitter campaign as of late to turn Captain America gay. Have him fall in love with his good friend Bucky Barnes and have those two start going at it and everything.
Eh. You know, I’m sympathetic to the idea that gay people would like to see themselves represented in a super hero movie but I’m not sure rewriting a character who has been obviously straight (hello, he’s carried a torch for Agent Peggy Carter forever) and turn him gay out of left field.
Plus it seems stereotypical to assume that because someone has a longtime friendship with someone of the same sex (like Cap and Bucky) that they just can’t be friends and instead that friendship must somehow mean they’re gay.
It’s probably not all that politically correct to argue against it but the idea just seems to out of left field to work. Plus, I’m not sure movie studios want to start making changes to movies based on twitter campaigns. Before you know it, the masses will just start running the movie business.
A gay superhero could work but I think the solution would be to find or create a gay super hero and not necessarily rewrite a currently straight hero to become gay.
What say you, 3.5 readers?
I’d like to start out by being close-minded and say…NO!!!
This happens every once in awhile. Whenever they are in the market for a new James Bond, every British person who wants the role starts doing interviews to float the idea that they wouldn’t mind being James Bond.
A whole bunch of male Brits have put themselves out there…but Emilia Clarke from Game of Thrones did an interview saying she wouldn’t mind being “Jane Bond.” Gillian Anderson (Is she even British? I’ll have to look it up) said the same.
Ladies, look. More power to you but these films are an outlet for me and many dudes to fantasize that a world exists where men are allowed to be men, that in our minds we are James Bond and that we could drive around in fast, expensive cars, live rich, extravagant lifestyles, and be so studly that we seduce women into giving up international secrets.
We know women can seduce men into giving up any info. There’s no challenge there. That Bond gets all these women to do his bidding is like the ultimate fantasy. Never happens in real life so let us dream.
And besides…Bond’s women have names like “Pussy Galore.” What would Jane Bond’s boyfriend be? “Gotta Bigdonger?”
Women…stop. Just stop. We have to draw the line somewhere. I forbid this.
What say you 3.5 readers?

Daily Discussion?
Well, I’ll put up another tomorrow morning, but let’s call this a nightly discussion.
It happens in a number of zombie movies/TV shows. It becomes a prime source of contention.
One character befriends another character. Things are going fine then boom…it is discovered that this new person is secretly keeping their zombified friends and/or family alive (as alive as they get.)
WALKING DEAD SPOILERS:
FEAR THE WALKING DEAD SPOILER
Madison’s family spends most of the second season on a boat voyage to a secret location (thanks to Strand.) Alas, the woman in charge is keeping her zombified friends/family captive in hopes of a cure.
SHAUN OF THE DEAD SPOILER
Shaun keeps his zombified buddy chained up in a shed in the backyard. Sometimes, he even plays video games with him.
WHAT SAY YOU, 3.5 READERS?
This may be controversial but I think I’m leaning towards chaining up my zombified friends/family if it can be done so safely in the hopes of an impending cure.
Perhaps one day zombie-ism will be reduced to something as easily treatable as a cold.
Maybe your local pharmacy will start selling Vick’s Anti-Zombie Rub.
Hell, maybe your zombified charges will get to see the future. Chain those zombies up in a bunker and in a thousand years when they cure zombies they’ll not only be cured but they’ll see the world of tomorrow.
DRAWBACKS
Ahhh…shit I can see the drawbacks though. Keeping a zombified human is a lot like having an exotic pet.
Will I ever be able to go on vacation again? Do I really want to impose on someone to care for my zombies while I’m away?
Do I want to be that guy who hoodwinks a buddy to zombie sitting for me away?
“OK here’s my elaborate set of instructions. Throw one live goat into my zombie’s pit every day and make sure to keep those chains oiled.”
WHAT SAY YOU 3.5 READERS?
I think you have to err on the side of caution and keep your zombified loved ones safe and sound in the hopes that a zombie cure is found.
What say you, 3.5 readers?
Good morning 3.5 Readers.
Are you all refreshed after the long Memorial Day Weekend?
It goes by too fast, doesn’t it?
Anyway, have you been following the news story about the Cincinnati Zoo?
If you haven’t heard about it, a four year old boy somehow managed to fall fifteen feet into the zoo’s “Gorilla World” exhibit.
Harambe, a seventeen year old gorilla, found the kid and at one point, grabbed him and rather violently dragged him through the water.
Zoo keepers had to act fast and decided to shoot the gorilla dead. They have explained that it was the only option. They say a tranquilizer dart would not have acted fast enough and may have even angered the gorilla and caused him to become even more violent before it kicked in.
Faced with taking a chance that they could have somehow saved the boy without harming the gorilla or shooting the gorilla, they chose to shoot him.
A lot of people are complaining that the zoo didn’t do the right thing. There’s an online petition, a hashtag #gorillalivesmatter and the usual armchair quarterbacking.
Personally, I think the zoo had to do what it had to do. I don’t think anyone wanted to kill the gorilla.
And you can’t really blame Harambe because he’s a frigging gorilla. Gorillas attack stuff. That’s what they do.
Some complainers point to a part of the video where it looked like he stands the boy up and looks like he wants to protect him.
I mean, maybe but maybe he was also thinking about the best way to crack the kid’s head open like a coconut.
Let’s be honest. Had the zoo not shot the gorilla and the gorilla had killed the kid, everyone, literally everyone, even the same people protesting the gorilla’s death, would be demanding to know why the zoo put a gorilla’s life over a boy’s.
Animal life over human life, you got to save the human.
I don’t want to immediately rush to judgment and start ragging on the family because I don’t know the full situation.
I suppose if there’s one lesson, it could be that zoos might review their exhibits and see if there are any holes that could be shored up, any little spaces where a little kid could conceivably squeeze through.
But at the same time, yeah, if you’re an adult, you’ve got to be keeping an eye on your kids.
I have no idea if the adults involved here weren’t paying attention and their kid wandered away, or maybe they were and the kid just got away from them, but I don’t know…people just need to be more careful, but at the same time zoos should review their exhibit security in light of the fact that we live in a world where literally on ne takes any responsibility for anything anymore.
RIP Harambe.
And kid, you’re 4 years old so I can’t blame you either. Hope you’re recovering well from the whole ordeal.
What say you, 3.5 readers?