…do you want to see on bookshelfbattle.com?
Let me know so that my 3.5 regular readers might benefit!
I don’t remember how old I was, but I want to say probably around ten, give or take a year.
I wish I knew where it was. Probably thrown away long ago.
The title? Attack of the Killer Mutant Fish
The plot? Fred the pet store owner’s day goes haywire when a mad scientist walks in and dumps toxic ooze into his fish tanks. I had recently visited a pet store, thus providing me with the inspiration. Also, I was a fan of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, though had I managed to get a book deal, Eastman and Laird (creators of TMNT) probably would have sued my ten-year old self.
Medium? Written in a notebook with a pencil in horrible penmanship.
(Cue Bob Saget Narrator from How I Met Your Mother Voice) – Kids, there was a time when not everyone had a computer, or if they did, it didn’t do much. People weren’t obsessed with snapping pictures of what they had for lunch and sharing it with the world, or writing angry tirades about the waitress who brought them cold food and then posting it on Facebook. When people wanted to write, they used these things called pencils to make marks on paper. You know paper right? Thin sheets made out of wood pulp? Never mind.
Review? – As Jon Lovitz’ The Critic would say, “It stinks!” There was a lot of action. The fish grow to an enormous size. They try to eat everyone. Fred shoots the mutant fish. It was pretty much devoid of any artistic merit.
Or was it? Yes, come to think of it, it was an avant grade piece way before its time. It was a grim indictment of man’s futile attempt to conquer nature. In fact, I wrote that in pencil as a subtitle, right on the first page of my notebook:
ATTACK OF THE KILLER MUTANT FISH
OR, A Grim Indictment of Man’s Futile Attempt to Conquer Nature
By: Young Bookshelf Q. Battler
I can’t say it had much in the way of character development. Fred was given no backstory whatsoever. No wife and kids that were depending on him to earn money as a pet store owner. He wasn’t a former soldier who botched up an anti-evil fish mission, forcing him to retire and languish away as a boring pet store owner until finally, fate offered him a chance to redeem himself.
And there was literally no explanation as to why a pet store owner had a gun that he was able to use to fend off the killer mutant fish. Was the pet store in a downtrodden, crime-ridden neighborhood? Was Fred an ex-member of the Yakuza, and thus he felt the need to pack heat at all times out of fear that he could be attacked by his enemies at any moment?
As for the Mad Scientist, the man didn’t even get a name. He just walks in, dumps toxic ooze into the tanks, then leaves. Kind of a jerk, really. But who was he? Was he a deranged Chemical Engineer, whose ideas were rejected one too many times by his scholarly peers, so he decided to take revenge and take over the world with an army of killer mutant fish? Perhaps he was Fred’s arch-nemesis? Maybe Fred and the Scientist once fought in battle during their Yakuza days and now were clashing again?
Personally, I just like to assume Fred stole the Mad Scientist’s woman.
Anyway, I wish I could find the notebook that contained this harrowing tale. But this blog post will serve as the treatment, so if any big time hotshot book agents and/or Hollywood bigwigs are reading, let me know if you are interested and also how much money you want to throw my way.
For your information…I just wanted to make my 3.5 regular readers aware that I am so dedicated to them that I trudged through 571 miles of arctic tundra and punched a Yeti in the face just to get to a computer in time to complete the latest installment of the one post a day for 2015 challenge.
So please keep this in mind when you’re choosing which blogs to follow. Many bloggers are great. Few are willing to punch Yetis in the face for their 3.5 regular readers’ benefit.
Saul Callers!
Do you love this show or what? It may not be Breaking Bad, but so far, it’s the next best thing.
At this point, I better call SPOILERS.
This episode focuses around the missing Kettleman family. Saul wanted Mr. Kettleman as a client, believing him to be guilty of siphoning over a million dollars through his job for the county.
Long story short, Nacho wants the money and Saul’s in a pickle – does he warn the Kettleman family and risk Nacho’s wrath or does he keep quiet?
Do I go on or do I avoid spoilers? I’ll avoid spoilers.
Best parts:
What do you think so far? Is it as good as Breaking Bad? Is it at least some balm to heal our Breaking Bad wounds?
“Now, I’m not going to deny that I was aware of your beauty. But the point is, this has nothing to do with your beauty. As I got to know you, I began to realise that beauty was the least of your qualities. I became fascinated by your goodness. I was drawn in by it. I didn’t understand what was happening to me. And it was only when I began to feel actual, physical pain every time you left the room that it finally dawned on me: I was in love, for the first time in my life. I knew it was hopeless, but that didn’t matter to me. And it’s not that I want to have you. All I want is to deserve you. Tell me what to do. Show me how to behave. I’ll do anything you say.”
– Choderlos De Laclos, Dangerous Liaisons
The year was 1988 and to be honest, it seemed like a dumb movie. But it was based on a classic novel, and starred a young Michelle Pfeiffer. It went on to positive critical acclaim – even though it mainly featured French aristocrats in fancy outfits babbling on incessantly forever.
The plot? A widow and her lover make a bet that the lover can seduce a woman who is pure of heart. To the lover’s dismay, he actually falls in love with the woman.
People sometimes put physical looks on too high a pedestal, don’t they? I mean sure, none of us wants to marry a CHUD monster (Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dweller – scary film, look it up), but on the other hand, beautiful doesn’t always = nice and or kind. Shouldn’t we try to get past looks and see what’s in a person’s soul?
I mean, looks are great, but they don’t last forever, and long after they fade, you still have to live with the person, so hopefully they’ll have a decent personality too.
All I’m saying is don’t miss out a good but ordinary looking person to go for someone who may look great, but doesn’t act so great.
I have no idea if my advice is helpful though. I’m about as romantic as a CHUD.
GRRR…ARRRGH…SPOILERS!
“We are the Walking Dead.”
Was Rick’s statement in the barn tonight just a random thought or did it hold greater meaning for the show?

Rick shooting the crap out of zombies on my bookshelf. Keep it down, guys. I’m trying to take a nap.
We all thought “the Walking Dead” referred to the zombies – does it actually refer to the human survivors?
MIND=BLOWN!
Other thoughts:
What did I miss? Discuss!
Too young to retire, too old to hang out at da club, the right age to buy an overpriced sports car. Happy 40th Birthday SNL!
I wish I could watch your special but I’m too hooked on Walking Dead. Hopefully tonight’s special will end up on Hulu or on NBC On Demand.
I totally love SNL. Watching it as a kid, trying to do the imitations the cast were doing – fun stuff. Everyone seems to love the cast they grew up with the best. Which cast is your favorite?
“I am nothing special; just a common man with common thoughts, and I’ve led a common life. There are no monuments dedicated to me and my name will soon be forgotten. But in one respect I have succeeded as gloriously as anyone who’s ever lived: I’ve loved another with all my heart and soul; and to me, this has always been enough.”
– Nicolas Sparks, The Notebook
I already commented on poor Nicolas Sparks’ divorce so I won’t go into it again. For those 3.5 regular readers who are paying attention – no, I never was able to confirm whether or not Michael Crichton actually made a real, live dinosaur. I’m pretty sure he didn’t, but I just don’t have any hard evidence one way or the other. I didn’t see him make a dinosaur. But I didn’t NOT see him make a dinosaur either.
But anyway – going along with the theme from yesterday (the quote from Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables) – here is another man opining that love is the best experience of life.
Is it?
I will say this – the year was 2004 and the Bookshelf Battler was in a movie theater packed to the gills with women pulling out tissues and sniffing up a storm. No joke. No exaggeration. Sparks’ sappiness made a theater full of women ball their eyes out, and I suppose that’s why he makes the big bucks. That’s real talent.
Valentine’s Day may be over, but let’s extend it a few more days and talk about romantic literary quotes. Here’s one:
“To love or have loved, that is enough. Ask nothing further. There is no other pearl to be found in the dark folds of life.”
– Victor Hugo, Les Miserables
Here, Hugo is basically saying that finding love is the best experience of life, and if you’ve ever loved someone, then stop worrying about all of the other things you want to accomplish, because you’ve already achieved the best thing that life has to offer.
Is love the best thing life has to offer?
Personally, I’ve found and lost love, and I argue that fro yo with gummy bears is a more enjoyable life experience.